Two Dimensional or Too Much? How about a Complex In Between?

We’ve all seen it in books or in films – you get one main character who shines brightly while all those around him or her are two dimensional and not important – Trouble is, that can carry  over into the plot, as well, so you get one bright storyline lacking definition or depth.

Some of that is done for speed, I’m sure of it. Generally, as a reader, I like to feel that the fictional world I am exploring is populated with realistic people. Sometimes, though, a short single-threaded story is fine – we all have different moods and want different entertainment at different times. Sometimes a light book and a short uncomplicated story is exactly right.

Then you get a fat book and the only reason it’s fat is because EVERYBODY tells their whole dang life story – all of them right from childhood. Some people will like that, too – hey, it takes all sorts, but some of the stuff that comes along seems to have nothing to do with the plot.

Okay, I confess, I’m a person who, as a kid watching Coronation Street with my mom, would wish that a spaceship would land in the middle of it. There didn’t seem to be any point to Coronation Street, yet it ran for years and was hugely popular – so don’t go by my standards.

*

I like to meet interesting and realistic characters, whether they are minor or major figures in the plot, but I do like there to be a plot. I don’t mind if there are childhood stories to tell – so long as it’s not everyone and his/her dog.

Okay, so I like to read complex stories and I like to produce complex stories. I do write a crowded book. My science fiction stories are full of characters and every one of them comes to life to one degree or another, but I don’t offer the reader psychoanalysis on them and things aren’t generally that mundane.

The characters themselves are who you meet, same as the real people you come across in the course of your day. Some you like, some you don’t, and some you’ll think are weird. They are each there for a reason and not to just fill the pages. They are part of the story.

Some have taken off on their own, but only within the limits of who they are. I enjoy those ones and let them do their thing ,and it is always rewarding.

What I like most about a range of characters, both main people and background people, is that it offers more to every reader. There’s going to be someone in there you like better than others and can identify with.

That’s what I look for as a reader, too, not only for a great read but the freedom to choose a character to follow.

Regardless of genre, what’s your favorite type of book? Does it vary a lot with your mood? Or are you particular about lightness or complexity?

Whatever you enjoy – Happy reading everyone.

Cheers!

😀

Allyson

12 thoughts on “Two Dimensional or Too Much? How about a Complex In Between?

  1. Rob

    “as a kid watching Coronation Street with my mom, would wish that a spaceship would land in the middle of it.”

    Ok, but lets not forget that Dr Who has had spaceships landing in all manner of British streets for decaades, therefore meeting your criteria, AND in the process becoming the longest running TV show of all time!

    Coincidence? I think not….we ALL like spaceships landing in our streets…lets just come out of the closet and admit it….. 🙂

    Reply
  2. Rob

    oops…..typo….. a holiday in Britain to watch spaceships land in their streets to the first who pics it…no really, I’m serious…..

    Reply
  3. Rob

    Damnation…… I just got back from the bank organizing the loan for the fare….. guess Ill head off to Thailand instead…..

    Reply
    1. A.D. Everard Post author

      Well, seeing as how you were the first to pick the typo, you can still go to Britain. You might want to pack skiing gear, though, just in case (yes, I know it’s Summer over there now). I’ll stay here in front of the heater. 🙂

      Reply
  4. D. Emery Bunn

    I write very complex stories, in setting, character, and plot. The funny thing is that you don’t see that if you read my first drafts. Setting comes in first, then the plot arrives in the next draft, and finally character arrives. Each modifies the one before it, ultimately creating a multi-layered tapestry where nothing is as simple as it seems. Even the most obvious “stereotype”…isn’t.

    Needless to say, I love reading that sort of stuff, but I can read simpler stories and enjoy them too.

    Reply
    1. A.D. Everard Post author

      This is great! You sound so like me. I also write in layers. It’s builds such a rich tapestry, I’m often surprised by the result – I know exactly what you’re saying. That sort of complexity gives the sort of depth that allows a reader to really get immersed in the story. When I find a book like that, I just don’t want to come out of it! 😀

      Reply
      1. D. Emery Bunn

        Well here’s hoping you love Darkness Concealed then. What’s messing with me is that I wrote it with the plan of having one character be the “main development arc” (all of them develop, some more than others). A couple of days ago I realized that it’s someone completely different who has the story’s focus.

        Reply
        1. D. Emery Bunn

          It has 4 meanings, only 3 of which are evident from the book itself. The fourth won’t make sense until the sequel comes out.

          Why yes, I LOVE double/triple/quadruple meanings. They litter my work, ESPECIALLY in titles.

Share your views?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s